I think that most things went well in this magazine. The quality of my work increased with every time spent on it. What worked very well was all the critiques done on my paper and how much time I actually spent on them. I have had so many critiques and I would change something then people would say to change it again. In the long run it helped me shape my article into a well written piece. I used a significant amount of my time helping my editor with the indesign layout. We spent a lot of time trying to figure out what worked and what didn't. I was proud of my layout because a lot of people said that the designs were really good.
2. What challenges did you face as you moved from an early draft or idea to a final product?
One of the challenges I faced was trying to create a well written introduction. I felt that it was hard trying to make a precise into without leaving out too many details or not putting much in. If you looked at my drafts at one point I only had two sentences as my intro, it was difficult trying to let the intro create the mood for the reader to get the relaxed vibe as if it were a story being told. I ended up writing a couple more sentences to make a little intro that incorporated my personality so that the reader feels my story the whole time they read it.
3. What other examples of work—student and professional—stood out as exemplary and served as a good model for your own work?
No comments:
Post a Comment